All posts in Ephemera

Articles

Blogging Changes Quickly

I just finished reading an article on Mashable called “A Look Back at the Last 5 Years in Blogging“. For the most part, I think this post  gives a solid overview of these past and very formative years for the Internet. If you’ve just excaped from life under a rock, you might give it a read. Toward the end of the post, you can find the understatement, “tumblelogs have become extremely popular due to their ease of use.” The author  interviewed some guy who is a digital strategist and he said “Blogging tools have made it easier for people to focus on content production rather than the often tedious process of content formatting. If anything is responsible for the popularity of blogging the steady improvement of the tools over the years has to be it,”

It’s that “ease of use” that will probably define the next five years of blogging. Twitter is easy to use. Tumblr is easy to use. Pinterest is easy to use. Facebook is easy to use. (All of these are blog-like, in one way or another.)

In a way, I love it all. There are all these new, fun, easy-to-use ways for pretty much anybody to share what they’ve got. They can share it with their friends, with an audience of millions, and also with the corporations who own these platforms! It’s that last bit that troubles me. Other people’s websites can get crappy or they can die. The aforementioned post about the last five years of blogging history begins with a mention of Technorati, which was once a huge part of blogging, but now Technorati is largely irrelevant to the blogosphere. Will twitter still be here in five years? Probably. Will it be bought out by CNN? God knows, CNN can’t seem to shut the hell up about what’s on Twitter, these days. Whether it’s CNN, Twitter, or not, the question is: will a company buy it and make it crappy? Yahoo bought Delicious and damn near ruined it. Just recently, Twitter bought Posterous. Will the average blogger care which company owns their blogging platform of choice, or whether it dies off? Does it really matter?

Well, I care, not super passionately, but I’m aware of it, anyway. Mostly, I like to have my stuff where I have a larger measure of control over it, which is why I have my own domain. I realize that, in order to have your own domain, you need to have a bit more technical know-how than the average internet user. And that brings me to two more things:

1. tumblr and the others  are easier and more fun to use than wordpress.

2. Shouldn’t my own domain be able to better connect to all that other stuff out there?

These two complaints are mostly based on my own preferences, but I’m sharing them, in case there might be something out there that I’m missing.

First, it just doesn’t seem fair that so many other, closed platforms should be so much faster to innovate and so much more fun/easy to use. Although I have gone to the trouble of hosting my own site, and yes, I can and do spend lots of time tinkering with it, there are times when I want all the fuss to go away and to just rock out some new stuff on the web, you know? Many of the easier, non-hosted options I’m thinking of, they start with a simple question like “what’s on your mind” and/or some very simple buttons that say things like “video” “audio” “link” and so on. WordPress, which is my blogging software of choice, it hasn’t, until recently, offered options like that, and now they’re only half-baked. Can’t I have easy and simple posting options in addition to all the other power that WordPress offers me?

(I should mention that, yes, I am aware of, and I’m excited about, the new post formats for wordpress and I’ve seen the feature begin to creep its way into wordpress and I know about  the WooTumblog plugin (I reluctantly use it despite its faults). These are all things that strive toward something like that simple set of buttons that let you choose things like “audio,” video” or “link” and to quickly and easily post them. I worry a little bit that this functionality will be implemented in much the way that tags were added to wordpress: everybody builds a million ways to do it and eventually the best one wins, which is fine, except that afterwards your data ends us scarred by leftover cruft from previous attempts at getting it right. This is because WordPress plugins are notoriously terrible at uninstalling themselves, in my experience. Remember “ultimate tag warrior” and all its bretheren? Then, there was tagging. Then, nothing had tags. Then, there were hashtags, instead. I digress.)

Second, if there’s so much fun to be had on so many other networks out there, and if there isn’t any sign of that fun stopping any time soon, then shouldn’t I be able to connect my self-hosted website, in an easy and fun manner to all the fun that’s out there? Well, actually, that’s a hell of a lot more easily said than done. At last count, there were something like 35 ways to stream your life, some of which are easier to use than others and some of which are self-hosted. Many of these rely on yet another website to use out there somewhere, which kinda defeats the purpose. Then again, maybe the idea that you can have “all your stuff all in one place” on the internet simply isn’t realistic, even if that “one place” is your very own domain.

In conclusion, I should say, simply, that it has been an incredible five years for blogging and the history of the internet. I only hope that the self-hosted website doesn’t lose out during the next five, and I think that ease-of-use and widespread compatibility are the two best ways to ensure that it doesn’t lose out.

Images

l-o.b-s.t-e.r…

l-o.b-s.t-e.r…

Video

E-Book Interface Prototype Demo

cool video

The Death of Hypertext?

Hypertext.” When I was a college student, I was obsessed with the idea that, some day, we would all be creating and consuming information— not just information, but literature—via portable devices like cell phones, when the hyperlink might become as central to reading and writing as the sentence. Since then, that day has come and gone. There are millions of people out there sporting an iPhone, an Android, a Kindle, an iPad, a netbook, a tablet, what-have-you. This year alone, there has been a doubling of the number of people who e-readers and tablet computers. Since then, nearly everyone I know can communicate with nearly everyone else I know, simply by pasting a hyperlink, sometimes without adding any additional information at all. By all accounts, this seems to be the moment I was waiting for.

On the other hand, I’ve just encountered two accounts that wonder about “why the book’s future never happened” and “the problem of how hypertext poems composed in the late 1990s have aged” by Paul Laforge and Benjamin Paloff, respectively.

What happened?

These two accounts differ in their approaches to that question, but they both agree pretty closely on the problem.

“hypertext fiction is in a tough place now. Born into a world that wasn’t quite ready for it, and encumbered with lousy technology and user-hostile interface design, it got a bad reputation, at least outside of specialized reading circles. At the same time, it’s impossibly hard to create, one of the only modes of fiction I know of which is more demanding than the novel. (And then add to that the need to create a user interface, and maybe a content-management system, and is it going to be an app? Suddenly your antidepressants aren’t nearly strong enough to get you out of bed.)”— Paul Laforge

“The paradox of this proliferation of online information is that, while by no means immune to decay, the information is quickly superseded by new dispatches, which in turn accelerates its aging. As we have seen, a book of poems published on acid-free paper in 1997 can easily look like a book published in 2011; in the United States, it is not uncommon for a book to go through multiple printings with little or no change in design. But a hypertext poem coded in 1997 shows its age almost immediately, whether because its design elements reflect earlier stages of a rapidly changing programming environment, or perhaps because the coding requires now-obsolete software.”Benjamin Paloff

If the world doesn’t yet have a strong, ongoing body of hypertext literature, could it be because the idea was born before the widespread popularity of web standards? Are the early hypertexts akin to the early attempts at bookmaking, and so will hypertext literature require an element of conservation science in order to survive? Will it be transcribed or upgraded, the way the ancient writing was transcribed from scroll, to manuscript, to book, to database? (Would cloud-based bookstores prove to be the dawn of a new dark age once the power goes out?)

I’m asking many questions here. I don’t propose to answer any of them here, merely to invite conversation.

Is hypertext literature dead? I don’t think so, but I do think it is ready for its “web 2.0” moment, wherein it becomes something easier to do, something everyone can enjoy. I think it might also help to consider the idea broadly, because in many ways it has caught on, and it isn’t aging, if the idea is allowed to include: video games, blogs, net art… the socially-networked/narrated identities of millions of people. I suppose it is possible that the Web 2.0 moment IS the hypertext literature moment. If that’s the case, then there’s just one troubling thing, as Laforge points out:

“And then … nothing happened. The Wikipedia entry for hypertext fiction lists no works published after 2001, and although Wikipedia isn’t the final word on anything, you have to think, if someone had written a hypertext fiction, this is where they’d want to tell you about it. The form’s seeming demise is puzzling…”

(Update: as it turns out, the authors of hypertext fiction don’t seem to use Wikipedia “to tell you about it”. Instead, these authors use things like conferences of the Modern Language Association, a large and growing database of electronic literature sponsored by the National Endowment for the Humanities, and a series of anthologies published by the Electronic Literature Organization at MIT. So, the work is out there, if you know where to look.)

Maybe it’s just that “hypertext fiction” is the wrong search query. Let’s try another one, which yields some very familiar-looking results. Let’s try “conceptual literature” instead:

“With the rise of the Web, writing has met its photography. By that, I mean that writing has encountered a situation similar to that of painting upon the invention of photography, a technology so much better at doing what the art form had been trying to do that, to survive, the field had to alter its course radically.” — Kenneth Goldsmith

The time might be right, after all. I agree with Laforge’s conclusion, “I believe that the promise of hypertext fiction is worth pursuing, even now, or maybe especially now.”

That pursuit: what should it look like, now that it is 2012?

More Scriptwriting Software

There’s a new app for writing screenplays and scripts, and it’s open source. Read about it. Download it. Tell me what you think.

Eldorado to the Moon

New Social Network for Writers

Social networks for writers come and go, but a new one has come.  It’s called Jottify. Like the ones before it, you can share what you’ve written, find new readers, and have discussions. It also allows you to create a group, but it seems that the group doesn’t have any privacy settings. 

There are, of course, many options to choose from, if you want to do social networking for writers. Another option is to use Google Plus to connect to other writers
Do we really need yet another, dedicated social network just for writers? What do you think? What should its features be?

download space age pop music galore

I still haven’t picked out the definitive examples of what interests me about this eclectic and silly genre of music called “space age pop”.

Meanwhile, I like that I’m able to download dozens of sample albums from the space age pop era.

Funny Space Costumes

Check out the ziggy stardust ipad with the extendable, um, dongle thingie.

Close Encounters

I saw the movie “Close Encounters” tonight. I think I must have seen it before, maybe when I was a kid. It has some things in common with the idea I’m working on. It’s something to think about.

A Kick Start for Infinity’s Kitchen

Tonight, I like to think that the fireworks are celebrating the launch of my latest project: to raise funds to support Infinity’s Kitchen the publication that I started a few years ago. Please take a look!

I had a lot of fun making this video. I did it with Microsoft PowerPoint, since I don’t have a video camera. I think it worked out nicely!

the ability to control who sees what

I think that a recent article in PC magazine makes an interesting point about Google+, the new social web app from Google. One of the new features is the ability to group your friends in to what’s called “circles”.

Among all the interesting features of Google+, one of the most heavily touted is Google Circles. Circles are what Google calls the various groups that you can organize your friends into. Once you’ve got them set up and populated, you then can pick which circles get to see the stuff you share. Your thumbs-down review of the latest episode of Glee? Probably just your friends. A chat about the company picnic? Work colleagues only for that one. Pics of your three-year-old niece? Strictly family. You get the idea. This YouTube video explains further:

Although Google holds it up as a differentiator, Facebook actually has a similar feature that lets you pile friends together in specific buckets—although, importantly, the “share only with these guys” isn’t nearly as convenient. Google+, however, puts Circles front and center, playing up the premise that you don’t want to share everything with everyone. And that idea is certainly true, but Google Circles is still the most misguided feature of the new social network.

The main problem with Google Circles is that it’s tedious.

It’s so tedious to do, with Facebook, that I’m sure many users don’t even know that they have the ability to control who sees what. It’s an important feature, and it needs to be simple.

Offline, if I want to hang out with sports fans, I go to the sports pub. When I want to talk about books and literature, I go to a reading. It’s easy to move around among various circles.

Online, I’m expected, by default, to say everything I say to everyone I know, reardless of why I know them, whether they’re interested, etc. That’s no good, and somebody should fix it, and fix it well.

If this article is still to be believed, we’ll have to wait for a feature like that. This new one isn’t any easier, either.

My Favorite Notebook

I’m looking to replace my very favorite notebook, which is all filled up now. Unfortunately, they don’t seem to make these anymore.

I’m posting this in the hopes that someone can help to point me in the right direction. I contacted the manufacturer, whose website suggests that they no longer make these, but they never replied. I’ve done all this because I loved that notebook so much and I want another one.

It is a hardbound book, with a cloth covering of some sort. The spine is sewn such that the open book lays flat. The paper is smooth and thick and white; it is acid-free (I think) and does not bleed through when I use a pen. The paper is narrow ruled (1/4 in (6.35 mm) spacing between ruling lines), with no vertical margin line. It measures 8″ wide by 10.5″ high and 1″ thick.

This is my favorite notebook.

This is my favorite notebook.

When opened, my favorite notebook lays flat.

I have filled my favorite notebook with words and drawings

I have filled my favorite notebook with words and drawings

It has a hardbound cover, with cloth on it

It has a hardbound cover, with cloth on it

Trade Tweets for Books

Here’s another interesting book companion site. This one lets you download a free copy of the book, if you tweet about it first. It seems like an interesting way to get readers. The book is called OH MY GOD WHAT HAPPENED AND WHAT SHOULD I DO?

Pottermore takes the “book companion website” to a whole new level

For a while now, I’ve been collecting examples of what I call the “book companion website”. The new “pottermore” website is probably going to become a very popular one, and if this intro video is any indication, this site will take the whole idea to an interesting new level.

Cassini Mission

Practical Lessons for E-Book Publishing

This summer, I hope to have published e-book versions of my novella. Today, I happened upon some good advice for anyone engaged in e-book publishing. I thought I would pass the advice along. It comes from Levi Asher, over at Literary Kicks.

It’s simple advice, really. I’ll paraphrase.

  1. Make it look good. A lot of e-books look crappy.
  2. “Formatting an e-book manuscript is a bitch.”
  3. Make an e-book for kindle, then make versions for the other devices.
  4. Be sure you can find an audience. This is easiest if you’ve written something you already know people will want.

I’m sure I can handle most of the points above, with the probable exception of number four.

Stream of Consciousness Writing

Stephen Dedalus is my name,
Ireland is my nation.
Clongowes is my dwellingplace
And heaven my expectation.

He read the verses backwards but then they were not poetry.

Lately I’ve been readingA Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. It isn’t poetry, but on occasion, as in the quote above, it reads like poetry.

I’ve been wondering, too, about stream of consciousness writing. I’m sure that Joyce isn’t simply writing down whatever happens to come to the top of his head (that’s called automatic writing). I think that good stream of consciousness writing has to be crafted, so that it flows as easily as thoughts do, and in the way that certain thoughts do.

Other times, I think it can be a happy accident that the writing comes out like raw thoughts. I’ve had that experience before.

One of the tracks on Strange Punctuation has a sort of stream of consciousness feel to it. It’s a collage, actually, made out of parts of several other recordings. My friend Curt made the track out of the material that hadn’t yet made the cut. This resulted in one of the more interesting spoken word recordings; it has a dreamlike mood to it, I think.

Scriptwriting Software

I’m (slowly) writing the script for a stage play. During my first draft, I sampled the various software apps that are designed to help a writer to produce a stage play, screen play, comic book script, etc. I thought I would blog some of my thoughts, in case anybody else out there finds them interesting.

Here’s what I’m looking for

When I’m writing, I want a comfortable, intuitive interface. I don’t want to fuss around with a bunch of complicated interface controls. I don’t want to spend my time on the formatting of the script; that’s the software’s job. This is very important to me, because I want to be comfortable when I write. It’s worth noting too, that in an age when I can buy a beautifully designed and intuitive app for $1 on my phone, I’m really not impressed by a $30 program that looks like it was designed when I was in High School (i.e. Windows 95). Design is a small point in this case, I know, but it matters to me.

I also want to be sure that whatever I’m writing in this special software is “portable” so that I can export it to an industry standard file type, change the margins and typesetting, or edit the document in another software application altogether. More technically speaking, I need my software to import/export file formats like Final Draft, Microsoft Word, Movie Magic Screenwriter, PDF, TXT or RTF. Why? Because I’m just now drafting my script, and I’m unsure what I’ll need to do with it later. I want my options open.

Scripwriting Apps

I tried out a lot of different apps, with help from demo versions and from friends. Here is a list, in order of my preference.

Celtx

This one tops the list because it is basically free, and totally usable. Celtx is designed to help you write a variety of scripts, including two standard formats for stage plays. The basic package is free. Plugins to add extra features are reasonably priced. In addition to basic scriptwriting, Celtx also has features for storing notes, visualization, formatting templates… This thing does a lot for free. The interface is simple and easy to understand. What it won’t do is import/export to very many standard file types, at least not out of the box. They probably make you buy a plugin for that. I haven’t looked into it. They also have an iphone app, but I don’t want to write on my phone, thanks.

Scrivener

I had a lot of fun using this application. For Windows users like myself, though, it is still in Beta, so there are some glitches. In addition to “word processor” mode, Scrivener also has tools to help you organize your notes, scenes and even the other documents you might be using as source material, etc. I found those extra features to be very helpful with my first draft. The Mac version of this is $50, but the beta for windows is currently free. You will want to go through the tutorial on this one, to learn all the useful features, but then you can get right down to writing with a nice interface. Be warned though: once the beta expires, you’ll have to upgrade, so save your work often or be prepared to upgrade. The beta can export to most, but not all, of the usual file types.

MovieMagic Screenwriter

Despite the irrelevant name of this app, I liked it. The word processing features are easy to use. The support for file formats is good. MovieMagic Screenwriter handles notes and scenes fairly well. It also integrates with Dramatica, so you can start there to hash out a rough outline. I found that this app, of all of them, gave me the best ability to write dialog quickly, while preserving format. Unfortunately, it costs $245.95, but if you’re going to spend hundreds of dollars on scriptwriting software, I think this is the best investment.

Dramatica Pro

Dramatica Pro deserves mention on this list. It isn’t going to help you write dialog, etc. but it is a nice brainstorming tool. It’s user interface is in very bad need of a complete and total overhaul, but once you get the hang of it, it might be useful. The software walks you through a sort of plot philosophy that seems to be designed to help you write a Hollywood blockbuster, but I found it to provide useful prompts for thinking about character interactions and plot complexity. It ain’t cheap, though.

Adobe Story

This is more like a web app. It supports standard formats. Adobe Story is easy to use. It works online and offline. It’s definitely worth a try. It’s free, for now, I guess?

Final Draft

Final Draft is one of the “industry standard” scriptwriting apps. It’s also very expensive. For your money, you get a word processor with minimal features to make it unique for writing scripts. The features that are there are very powerful. For example, the large number of formatting templates, the character names database, and collaboration mode. You’ll be able to dive right in, here and get the work done. It’s also worth noting that this app’s native file type is a very popular one.

There are others…

These were listed on Wikipedia but I haven’t tried them out yet. Your results may vary, so I’ll simply list them here.

If anybody knows of any others, or has reviews to share, please do post them in the commetns. As you can tell by now, I’m a windows user, but I welcome my Mac friends to share any notes about the software they like to use.

Images

Nothing is Original

Nothing is Original