Comments on: Google Goofs! http://nocategories.net/ephemera/google-goofs/ Rants, raves, and writings for your reading pleasure. Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:50:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: J. Nathan Matias http://nocategories.net/ephemera/google-goofs/#comment-1244 J. Nathan Matias Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:36:25 +0000 http://codex.nocategories.net/general/google-goofs/#comment-1244 <a href="http://www.xml.com/pub/a/w3j/s3.nelson.html">Ted Nelson doesn't like embedded markup</a>. There is also <a href="http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2004/10/06/deviant.html">a response on XML.com</a>. Note that whoever wrote this second article doesn't seem to be aware of Ted's actual software releases. Ted Nelson doesn’t like embedded markup.
There is also a response on XML.com.

Note that whoever wrote this second article doesn’t seem to be aware of Ted’s actual software releases.

]]> By: Dylan Kinnett http://nocategories.net/ephemera/google-goofs/#comment-992 Dylan Kinnett Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:16:35 +0000 http://codex.nocategories.net/general/google-goofs/#comment-992 What's wrong with XML? What’s wrong with XML?

]]> By: J. Nathan Matias http://nocategories.net/ephemera/google-goofs/#comment-979 J. Nathan Matias Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:36:36 +0000 http://codex.nocategories.net/general/google-goofs/#comment-979 Well, Ted is not particularly happy with XML, but the Fenfire people are planning to use RDF. (http://fenfire.org/) Well, Ted is not particularly happy with XML, but the Fenfire people are planning to use RDF. (http://fenfire.org/)

]]> By: Dylan Kinnett http://nocategories.net/ephemera/google-goofs/#comment-955 Dylan Kinnett Tue, 01 Mar 2005 03:39:08 +0000 http://codex.nocategories.net/general/google-goofs/#comment-955 I agree that what Google is up to here would be a great idea if only it were more user -controlled. Do you suppose we'll ever get anything resembling xanadu? It seems to me, by this point, it would have to be built out of xml, etc. Is that possible? I agree that what Google is up to here would be a great idea if only it were more user -controlled. Do you suppose we’ll ever get anything resembling xanadu? It seems to me, by this point, it would have to be built out of xml, etc. Is that possible?

]]> By: J. Nathan Matias http://nocategories.net/ephemera/google-goofs/#comment-930 J. Nathan Matias Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:10:48 +0000 http://codex.nocategories.net/general/google-goofs/#comment-930 This would be a great thing, if only (a) everyone got the chance, and (b) it were user-controllable. If annotations to anything were able to be made by anyone and viewed selectively by anyone, this would be great -- but oh. That would be closer Xanadu. This would be a great thing, if only (a) everyone got the chance, and (b) it were user-controllable. If annotations to anything were able to be made by anyone and viewed selectively by anyone, this would be great — but oh. That would be closer Xanadu.

]]>